|01-30-2009, 01:47 PM||#1|
I R Happy Goat
Join Date: May 2002
Next Windows 7 Milestone: Release Candidate
from microsoft-watch.com .......... News Analysis. How ready is Windows 7? Ready enough so there will be no Beta 2. Microsoft plans to go directly from Beta 1 to release candidate.
Can you say Windows is shipping sooner than later? Steven Sinofsky, senior vice president for the Windows and Windows Live Engineering Group, broke the news in a blog post time-stamped Midnight EST that popped up in my RSS feeds at noon. He writes:
The next milestone for the development of Windows 7 is the Release Candidate or "RC." Historically the Release Candidate has signaled "we're pretty close and we want people to start testing the release, especially because all the features are done." As we have said before, with Windows 7 we chose a slightly different approach which we were clear up front about and are all now experiencing together and out in the open.
Anyone else remember when a Windows version went from beta directly to RC? I sure as hell don't. Now contrast Steven's statement to Microsoft BS in November 2005. The company suspended monthly Windows Vista CTPs (Community Technology Previews) after just two releases. The ridiculous assertion: that Vista development was running ahead of schedule. A few months later, Microsoft delayed Vista's launch, missing Christmas PC sales.
Now this is running ahead of schedule. The move from beta to RC, just the announcement of it, shows Microsoft's confidence in Seven where it is. Microsoft also is putting its partner ecosystem on notice. Get ready, Seven is coming soon. Something else: Today's blog offers tacit advice to customers to begin Seven testing now, rather than upgrade from Windows XP to Vista. Steven won't directly say this; no sane Microsoft executive would say something to freeze Windows PC sales. But the schedule timing should be clear enough to IT organizations planning to buy new PCs with Vista rather than Windows 7.
In his blog post, Steven discusses some of the beta process, of collecting feedback and Microsoft's response, particularly with respect to compatibility. He writes:
The path to release candidate is all about getting the product to a known and shippable state both from an internal and external (beta usage and partner ecosystem readiness) standpoint. We will then provide the release candidate as a refresh for the Beta. We expect, based on our experience with the Beta, a broad set of folks to be pretty interested in trying it out.
Yeah, that has got to be an understatement. Steven continues:
With the RC, this process of feedback based on telemetry then repeats itself. However at this milestone we will be very selective about what changes we make between the Release Candidate and the final product, and very clear in communicating them. We will act on the most critical issues. The point of the release candidate is to make sure everyone is ready for the release and that there is time between the release candidate and our release to PC makers and manufacturing to validate all the work that has gone on since the pre-Beta. Again, we expect very few changes to the code. We often "joke" that this is the point of lowest productivity for the development team because we all come to work focused on the product but we write almost no code.
So there's no misunderstanding, Steven is saying that Windows 7 development already is winding down and that not only does Microsoft plan no Beta 2 but no Release Candidate 2, either. This kind of communication is risky, unless there's a high level of confidence to back it up. "This release will be Windows 7 as we intend to ship it," Steven writes about the RC.
It's also clear from the post how serious Microsoft is about compatibility and its partners getting compatible drivers out there during the Beta 1 process. Incompatibility was one of Windows Vista's shameful hallmarks, and the driver ecosystem was out of step with—as in behind—the operating system release. Steven writes, as example of compatibility updates:
Many GPU chipsets are being recognized and Windows 7 downloads the updated WDDM 1.1 drivers. While the Windows Vista drivers work as expected, the new 1.1 drivers provide enhanced performance and a reduced memory footprint, which can make a big difference on 1GB shared memory machines.
Uh-oh. I downloaded the WDDM 1.1 driver and got a big surprise. My graphics resolution maxed out at 1,024 by 768, when native resolution should be 1,600 by 900. Whoops. I had to change back to the older driver. By the way, I expected the driver switch to be a real hassle, requiring an earlier System Restore point to fix the resolution. Instead, the driver fix was totally hassle-free, which was a welcome surprise.
I'm running Windows 7 on my personal laptop: Sony VAIO VGN-Z590, with 2.4GHz Intel Core 2 Duo processor, a 13.1-inch LED backlit display with 1,600-by-900 resolution, 256MB nVidia GeForce 9300M GS graphics, 3GB of DDR3 memory, a 320GB hard drive (5,400 rpm), a dual-layer DVD burner, a fingerprint reader, Wi-Fi and a Sprint 3G modem. I have the 32-bit version of Windows 7 because the computer shipped with 32-bit Windows Vista.
The timing of Steven's blog is eerily coincidental. Two years ago today, Microsoft made Windows Vista generally available. There's an appropriateness to laying out Seven's release schedule on the second anniversary of its much-maligned predecessor. Microsoft is so over Windows Vista. Maybe you should be, too. Seven is moving remarkably fast to release.
It's now quite safe to speculate that Seven will release to manufacturing before June 30, the end of Microsoft's fiscal year. If Microsoft can make April 30, OEMs will have time to get new Windows 7 PCs on store shelves for the back-to-school season. Microsoft partners couldn't ask for much better than that.
"There is also a river called Helikon [in Pieria]. (...) But, they go on to say, the women who killed Orpheus wished to wash off in it the blood-stains, and thereat the River sank underground, so as not to lend its waters to cleanse manslaughter."
—Pausanias, Description of Greece 9. 30. 8
|01-31-2009, 02:13 PM||#2|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Far away from the sun.
As long as they can deliver a product that's not totally half-baked, they'll probably do ok.
Vista wouldn't have been a bad OS if it had been optimized and some of the less desirable "features" yanked or modified.
Shoot to kill, aim to please.
First to join Club Mathlete!
|01-31-2009, 02:38 PM||#3|
sorry, road the bus over u
microsoft has always used its customers as a beta 3 release. i know they have alpha and beta "invite only" customers, but what good is that when they okay the release of crappy software
ut2004 is closed. too much hacking
bauhaus- "factory town" ...oh to be, the cream oh to be, your dream
|01-31-2009, 04:00 PM||#4|
I plan on messing with the W7 beta but I need to purchase an external hard drive with enough capacity first, so that repartitioning (or fully reinstalling) doesn't mean I'm playing Russian roulette with my data.
|01-31-2009, 10:52 PM||#6|
Before you do that do a thorough disk check with disk utilities that can mark bad sectors and then make a backup image (Acronis or DriveImageXL) to another drive or dvd's (spanned archive).
Kief.net << Mix archive
|Display Modes||Rate This Thread|
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Microsoft to Release Pre-Beta Windows 7 Version in Late October||radio667||News Radio||7||09-30-2008 03:22 AM|
|No XP Reprieve; Windows 7 Release Set||radio667||News Radio||2||06-25-2008 09:15 PM|
|Firefox 2 Release Candidate 3 (RC 3) available||cUnNiNg_StUnTs||News Radio||1||10-17-2006 12:49 PM|
|WoW Subscriber Milestone||radio667||News Radio||13||06-16-2005 01:35 PM|